What I've modified are Adding copyright notification in both scripts/xfbrowser4.in and scripts/xfterm4.in. Removing extra white spaces and correction typo. in scripts/xfterm4.in Adding Japanese translations in gdm/xfce.desktop and removing trailer white space from Russian, also modifying original English (Xfce -> Xfce 4) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 243 this patch modifies misc. stuffs in xfce-utils
I don't really think it's appropriate to arbitrarily assign copyright to "xfce development team" when whoever wrote the file may not want to do that.
Created attachment 244 this patch only adds license term Oops, sorry then. I usually find copyright holder at configure.ac (AC_COPYRIGHT), firstly, then AUTHOR, ChangeLog, CVS commit log. I don't know how to get these info with SVN operation. So, in this time, I'd like to make it clear whether original author would be assumed copyright holder automatically, and what should I entry if I've come across like a following case, Author (unknown), Copyright holder/issued year (unknown), License (unknown) in the above case, could I consider them (no entry), (C) The Xfce development team, 2003-2005 (from ChangeLog), GPL or the like ?
Hi Brian, I've updated PO file at #973, take a look at that patch please.
As well, this account should be closed I think. FIXED or INVALID?
Created attachment 1172 spam
Created attachment 1173 spam
Sorry for the noise; spammer account disabled.
(In reply to comment #5) > As well, this account should be closed I think. > FIXED or INVALID? I've chosen 'INVALID'... -H-
The content of attachment 1172 has been deleted by Nick Schermer <nick@xfce.org> who provided the following reason: spam The token used to delete this attachment was generated at 2010-12-29 18:47:17 CET.
The content of attachment 1173 has been deleted by Nick Schermer <nick@xfce.org> who provided the following reason: spam The token used to delete this attachment was generated at 2010-12-29 18:47:30 CET.