I've seen that Nautilus uses .icon files to provide name and translations for every emblem, so a few icon themes seem to provide those .icon files. In my humble opinion, this is utterly useless. 1) Why should emblems have names? 2) Why should icon-themes carry text-files with translations? ad 1) If an emblem isn't verbose enough in what it looks like, it's a failure. If attached to a file or folder, you won't see its (file)name anyway. The only point I see in seeing the name is to bugtrack missing emblems when switching to a different icon-theme (as emblems are pretty non-standard and individual). ad 2) This point brings icon-theme providers into a weird spot, because those translations are hard to maintain and crude text-files are not exactly fun for doing so (although agreeably for some widespread emblems, translations could be borrowed from gnome's icon-theme). Therefore I propose to hide the emblem-names in Thunar's properties-dialog (as the title says).
I can set the original name as a tooltip, so even incomplete translations are not directly visible.
Sounds good to me!
Fixed in 4e853a9.