! Please note that this is a snapshot of our old Bugzilla server, which is read only since May 29, 2020. Please go to gitlab.xfce.org for our new server !
Make menus slightly transparent.
Status:
RESOLVED: FIXED
Severity:
enhancement

Comments

Description Simon Strandman 2005-10-03 15:09:05 CEST
It would be really nice with an option to have menus slightly transparent like
in Mac OSX. Early versions of xcompmgr could do this but it was removed.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Olivier Fourdan editbugs 2005-10-03 17:14:16 CEST
I disagree. Menus are just regular override redirect windows, like tooltips, and
plenty of other small temporary windows.

There is no way to make the menu transparent while keeping other override
redirect window opaque. And making all these transparent would not look very
good IMO.

The currect SVN code adds shadows to those, it looks pretty good. But I'm not in
favour fo adding transparency there.
Comment 2 Olivier Fourdan editbugs 2005-10-03 17:18:46 CEST
However... An option to add opacity like "popup_opacity" wouldn't hurt either...
Comment 3 Brian J. Tarricone (not reading bugmail) 2005-10-03 18:17:34 CEST
(In reply to comment #1)
> I disagree. Menus are just regular override redirect windows, like tooltips, and
> plenty of other small temporary windows.
> 
> There is no way to make the menu transparent while keeping other override
> redirect window opaque. And making all these transparent would not look very
> good IMO.

How about for windows of type _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_MENU...?
Comment 4 Olivier Fourdan editbugs 2005-10-03 19:35:12 CEST
Because nobody use that beside Gtk/GNOME and KDE and even then, they don't agree
on the meaning of the property...

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/wm-spec-list/2002-May/msg00001.html

Things might have improved since then, but even that would make menu
inconsistent with other toolkits...
Comment 5 Olivier Fourdan editbugs 2005-10-03 19:54:07 CEST
Ok, it's in SVN, revision 17978.

Option is "popup_opacity", between 0 and 100 (0 totally transparent, 100 totally
opaque)

One last question though, the OS mentionned in the report ("Windows XP") is a
mistake, isn't it?
Comment 6 Brian J. Tarricone (not reading bugmail) 2005-10-03 20:04:48 CEST
(In reply to comment #5)
> One last question though, the OS mentionned in the report ("Windows XP") is a
> mistake, isn't it?

He probably posted the original bug from a windows box.  The guided form doesn't
let you set OS anymore (though the expert form does) because I thought it was
somewhat extraneous, not that useful, and an extra step to make the
user-friendly form less user-friendly.
Comment 7 Simon Strandman 2005-10-03 21:46:19 CEST
(In reply to comment #6)
> He probably posted the original bug from a windows box.  The guided form doesn't
> let you set OS anymore (though the expert form does) because I thought it was
> somewhat extraneous, not that useful, and an extra step to make the
> user-friendly form less user-friendly.

Exactly, this is a dual boot machine.

Thanks for resolving this so quickly btw!

Bug #1170

Reported by:
Simon Strandman
Reported on: 2005-10-03
Last modified on: 2009-07-15

People

Assignee:
Olivier Fourdan
CC List:
0 users

Version

Attachments

Additional information